suppose you loved a woman and penned a poem for her

suppose you loved a woman and penned a poem for her
suppose you loved a woman and penned a poem for her.
suppose you deemed her incorruptible and placed her in heaven.

suppose a massive, money-losing corporation came along and threw her down into hell and stripped her bare so that their dwindling fanboy customer base could see her boobies!!! boobies!!!! ! !!

suppose then that the lead designer jonathan knight kept saying that they were staying loyal to your intent and world, while stripping your incorruptible love naked and throwing her into hell. (lozllzzllzl!!)

suppose that the "lead narrative deisgners" of the era hoping to work at ea all chimed in, stating that EA had to give the customer, investor, shareholders, women, Beatrice, Dante, Dante's religion, Dante's poem, and Play and Edge Magazines the finger for the sake of "gameplay."

the past is prologue, and i have marveled at how so many of you have railed against plato, aristotle, homer, george lucas, joseph campbell, and dante, who are only trying to help exalt games to their deserved heights as art.

as "narrative designers" you have thw opportunity to own the future of games, and to exalt them as epic art, but it seems you are preferring to sit back and justify the stripping of beatrice and the showing of her boobies to the world, hoping to be liked by the fanmbas who control the money supply. boobies!!! ! !! lolololl1l1l1oo1o1l1l1!!!aszzz!!! lolz!

it is truly amazing that so many would rather lose millions to expose dante's beloved's boobies, rather than exalt games as art.

instead of defending aristotle's and dante's timeless tenets, it seems like you are instead working for EA.

so here is the question:

suppose you loved a woman and penned a poem for her
suppose you deemed her incorruptible and placed her in heaven

then suppose you got a job as a "narrative designer" at a major corporation making your poem into a game.

would you strip her of her clothes and show her boobies to the world for the sake of "gameplay? and throw her into hell?

if you did, would you say it was all just for the sake of "the gameplay?" and that really story doesn't matter, and that besides, the game is still loyal to your original vision?

EA = the ends (boobies) justify the means (lying, hyping, and desecrating). lolzlzllzlzl! i wanna work @ EA! boooooobies! beatrice's boobies!!!!

rock on!

(i know that this post is critical of ea, and as they run these boards and dictate narrative design throughout the universe, i understand this post may need to be deleted for the greater good of humanity--so as to stay loyal to dante's true intent of boobbbobiesisisis!!! boobies! lolz!)

funny how quick you guys are to rush & protect EA:

From EA's very own forums:

From the opening sequence of the demo where Dante is stitching a cross into his skin to the nude Beatrice, I pretty much felt like I was being baptized in oily, filthy water... In summary, gameplay was lame, Dante's a moron, Beatrice is a *, camera movement was obnoxious, premise is embarrassing while pretending to be literary and historically informed, and I'd rather get Bayonetta than this crap. Apparently In summary, gameplay was lame, Dante's a moron.....

http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/15/349953.page

you should apply for a job moderating ea's forums!! disobedient fanboys longing for epic art must be stamped out, censored, and destroyed in the name of "gameplay"!!! lolzlzlzozllzzlz!! boobies!!!Arts Entrepreneurship & Technology(TM)
Hero's Journey Entrepreneurship(TM)
The Gold 45 Revolver(TM)
Dr. E on Facebook!!!